Hydrocephalic Parkinsonism: lessons from normal pressure hydrocephalus mimics
© Starr et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 25 March 2014
Accepted: 5 May 2014
Published: 29 October 2014
Hydrocephalus is an under-recognized presentation of progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) and dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB).
We describe four normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH)-like presentations of pathology-proven PSP (n = 3) and DLB (n = 1) and review the literature on the hydrocephalic presentation of these atypical parkinsonisms.
Despite the presence of ventriculomegaly disproportionate to the extent of parenchymal atrophy, all patients demonstrated early postural impairment and/or oculomotor abnormalities that encouraged a diagnostic revision. Hallucinations were the only early atypical manifestation of the hydrocephalic DLB presentation.
Early postural impairment, falls, oculomotor impairment, and/or hallucinations are inconsistent with the diagnosis of NPH and suggest PSP or DLB as the underlying NPH mimic. We postulate that previously reported cases of “dual” pathology (e.g., NPH and PSP) actually represent the hydrocephalic presentation of selected neurodegenerative disorders.
Hydrocephalus as an imaging finding is commonly interpreted as potentially representing normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) largely because of the favorable therapeutic implications . However, NPH is a relatively rare disorder, recently calculated to be 1.19/100,000/year, and reduced further to 0.36/100,000/year when defined as sustained improvement at 3 years after ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) placement . Between 1995 and 2003, from 411 patients referred as NPH to the Mayo Clinic, only 41 were tentatively endorsed as such and barely 14 experienced gait improvement after a trial of cerebrospinal fluid removal, the sine qua non for the diagnosis. Of the 12 patients who underwent VPS placement, definite gait improvement was present in only 6 by one year and just 4 after 3 years, one third of the original VPS-treated cohort. Remarkably, pathology available in 5 patients in the VPS-treated cohort revealed the presence of neurodegenerative disorders, progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) and dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), each accounting for a case.
Because of the large volume of NPH referrals to tertiary care centers, predicting a sustained response to VPS placement is paramount to justifying this invasive procedure. We examined four patients referred to us for suspected NPH but whose pathology demonstrated PSP and DLB. The preliminary diagnosis of NPH in these patients was based on the interpretation of imaging features, namely the presence of hydrocephalus judged disproportionate to the extent of surrounding parenchymal atrophy. While a careful neurological examination suggested further NPH work up was unwarranted in three patients, cerebrospinal fluid diversion in one (case 4) supported this diagnosis by yielding subjective benefits in gait and urinary function. In addition to early impairment postural reflexes, other clinical red flags against NPH emerged between 12 and 24 months. We suggest that PSP and DLB, as previously reported for Alzheimer disease (AD), is capable of generating a neuroimaging profile suggestive of communicating hydrocephalus, with ventriculomegaly disproportionate to the extent of parenchymal atrophy, prompting a diagnostic consideration for NPH and potentially misdirecting treatment toward cerebrospinal fluid diversion.
Four consecutive patients referred to our center for suspected NPH for whom brain autopsy was obtained were identified in our center from the years 2007–2012. After evaluation in our center, VPS placement was discouraged for the first three patients but pursued in the fourth to no avail. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients for the publication of patient-related data and videotapes.
This 79-year-old man developed difficulty with “complex” leg movements, such as those required when walking across a railroad or stepping on a train wagon. Brain MRI obtained within one year was interpreted as mild hydrocephalus (Figure 1B), prompting a referral for was consideration of VPS placement. His examination showed parkinsonism with marked gait and postural impairment, upgaze restriction, and stimulus-sensitive axial myoclonus (Additional file 2: Video S2), as well as mild dysexecutive impairment (MMSE = 28/30; Frontal Assessment Battery = 14/18; Montreal Cognitive Assessment = 25/30). His revised clinical diagnosis was PSP and VPS placement was discouraged. Death occurred 10 years after symptom onset. Post-mortem studies confirmed the diagnosis of PSP with associated low-grade AD neuropathology (Braak stage II; CERAD score A) and brainstem Lewy bodies.
This 73-year-old man initially exhibited falls, visual hallucinations, irritability and combative behavior. Within two months he was unable to ambulate independently and had noticeable memory loss. Brain MRI taken at 3 months from symptom onset demonstrated moderate ventriculomegaly without overt atrophy in the apical cuts, suggesting the diagnosis of NPH (Figure 1C). However, in short sequence he developed dysarthria evolving to anarthria, severe dysphagia, and needed assistance for all activities of daily living. At 5 months, his examination showed retrocollis with axial-predominant rigidity and ophthalmoplegia, taking place at one of his “bad spells” (Additional file 3: Video S3). Cognitive assessment was impossible given marked dysarthria. Rivastigmine provided no benefits but donepezil eliminated his visual hallucinations. A rapidly progressive form of PSP was suspected and shunting was discouraged. Despite the early rapid progression, death from aspiration pneumonia occurred six years after symptom onset. Post-mortem neuropathology unexpectedly revealed DLB (neocortical lewy body type, Braak stage V; high likelihood) (Figure 2E-F) with mild to moderate arteriolosclerosis and mild AD neuropathology (Braak stage II; CERAD score A).
This 72-year-old man with progressive gait and balance impairment underwent a brain MRI, which upon presence of hydrocephalus, hyperdynamic fluid signal in the third ventricle, and entrapped sulci in several cortical areas (Figure 1D) prompted a referral to our center. Initial examination 18 months after symptom onset demonstrated mild non-fluent aphasia, visuospatial dysfunction, and delayed recall (MMSE = 24; Montreal Cognitive Assessment = 13/30] in the setting of wide based, unsteady gait. Mild impairment of upgaze with absent vertical optokinetic responses was present at the initial examination (Additional file 4: Video S4). External lumbar drainage provided benefits in gait and urinary function. VPS placement, however, was followed by improvements in gait and urinary function for about 6 months, followed by deterioration of his overall parkinsonism and cognitive function. He developed frontal release signs and disinhibition, with worsening of dysexecutive dementia, mild facial dystonia, greater oculomotor dysfunction (impairment of upgaze, slowed downgaze, square-wave jerks), and marked postural impairment with backward falls. He died from aspiration pneumonia six years from onset of symptoms. Suspected PSP was confirmed on postmortem studies, which also revealed unusually marked and widespread occipital cortical involvement.
There are two major shortcomings in the appraisal of NPH as an entity, namely the absence of clinical and pathological biomarkers and the reliance on short-term response to drainage for its definition , which often does not “hold water” in the long term . Indeed, the longer the follow up, the lower the frequency of response, and the higher the diagnostic revision rate . Important lessons derived from the suspected NPH patients presented here were that cognitive impairment predated or occurred concurrently with gait dysfunction, and impairment of postural reflexes was universal. This is in keeping with the observation that postural instability at the initial evaluation of a suspected NPH patient predicts the absence of sustained improvement at 3 years from VPS placement .
Besides early impairment of postural reflexes, our patients had early cognitive impairment, either predating or occurring concurrently with gait impairment. Cognitive impairment is a regrettable component of the “classic” NPH triad. Of the 8 cognitively impaired VPS-treated patients in the Mayo Clinic series, only 1 continued to benefit at 3 years . This implies that by the time a patient with hydrocephalus develops cognitive impairment, the odds of shunt responsiveness are substantially low, and diagnostic considerations other than NPH are warranted. Patients may have AD if cognitive impairment predominates  and PSP or DLB if parkinsonism is an important clinical manifestation. In the former situation, AD biomarkers may be particularly helpful in discriminating AD from true NPH. In a sample of 37 prospectively followed VPS-treated “NPH” patients, poor sustained response was predicted by the presence of amyloid β plaques, neuritic plaques, and/or neurofibrillary tangles observed in cortical biopsies taken at the time of shunt insertion . Cortical biopsies identified amyloid-β aggregates in over half of presumed NPH patients who had initial response to VPS but eventual progression of dementia . Similarly, 8 out of 9 patients with clinically diagnosed NPH that came to autopsy at the Sun Health Research Institute within a 12-year period, demonstrated AD pathology (one also with DLB) and the other met pathologic criteria for PSP .
A major pitfall of the interpretation of these data is to assume that these patients had “co-occurrence” of AD and NPH [5, 6], rather than the hydrocephalic presentation of a single, neurodegenerative disorder. This potential misinterpretation is giving rise to reports of NPH patients “evolving” to AD , without considering the possibility that NPH may have been an early clinical misdiagnosis. Although the postulation of an “AD-NPH syndrome” [8, 9] has already led to a negative clinical trial , clinicians continue to offer VPS to patients with hydrocephalus in the setting of dementia, because it is part of the “classic triad” (conversely, some neurosurgeons may be reluctant to shunt if dementia is not present in patients whose hydrocephalus may “only” be associated with gait impairment).
NPH-like presentations for pathology-confirmed PSP and DLB cases: summary of the published literature
Disease duration at presentation
Initial clinical features
Late clinical features
Response to VPS
GD, CI, UI, postural instability
Transient improvement in GD/UI; worse at 3 years
GD, CI, UI
VPS placed, outcome data not available
GD, CI, UI, falls, generalized bradykinesia, dysarthria
Restriction of vertical eye movements, hypophonia, frontal release signs
GD, CI, UI, gait ignition failure, falls, hypomimia, micrographia
Restriction of vertical gaze, slow saccades, dysarthria, gait freezing
Transient improvement but progressive dementia
GD, CI, falls, micrographia
Restriction of vertical gaze, slow saccades, dysarthria, dysphagia, gait freezing, dementia
Transient improvement in GD/CI but progressive dementia
GD, CI, UI
VSGP, akinesia, rigidity
6-month “marked” improvement in GD, CI, and UI
GD, CI, UI, postural instability
“Clinical diagnosis of DLB”
Some improvement in GD at 3–6 months; no improvement at 3 years
VPS placed, outcome data not available
GD, CI, UI
Postural instability, falls, rare visual hallucinations
Initial marked improvement in GD/CI – No follow-up data.
Our cases and the review of the literature highlight several key clinically relevant messages: 1) early cognitive impairment is the most important “cognitive red flag” of the NPH triad and predicts an alternative diagnosis; 2) early impairment of postural reflexes, with or without falls, is the most common “motor red flag” of the NPH triad, and should suggest PSP or DLB; 3) visual hallucinations are a strong clinical biomarker of synucleinopathies  and their presence in the setting of hydrocephalus tilts the diagnostic yield toward DLB; and 4) a “honeymoon” period may occur after shunting in patients with PSP but further progression would be expected thereafter. To the extent that transient symptomatic relief in the setting of a neurodegenerative disorder may be preferable to no relief at all, the approach to a hydrocephalic patient with “red flags” may still include fluid diversion, but patients and families need to be counseled about the anticipated short-term gains.
In sum, hydrocephalus in the setting of postural impairment and/or oculomotor abnormalities most probably represents PSP or DLB. Hallucinations may be the only early manifestation of the hydrocephalic presentation of DLB. An initial promising response to VPS placement does not exclude the possibility of an underlying neurodegenerative disease. Furthermore, a fully formed “classic” triad of gait impairment, urinary incontinence, and cognitive impairment appears to be more common in conditions other than NPH. The accumulating evidence suggests that early postural impairment, falls, oculomotor impairment, or hallucinations are inconsistent with the diagnosis of NPH regardless of ventricular size. Recognition of the hydrocephalic presentation of PSP and DLB can avoid unnecessary and potentially harmful shunting procedures.
The authors acknowledge the Gardner Family Foundation for their support of the Brain Autopsy program at the University of Cincinnati.
- Klassen BT, Ahlskog JE: Normal pressure hydrocephalus: how often does the diagnosis hold water? Neurology 2011,77(12):1119–1125. 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31822f02f5View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Walchenbach R, Geiger E, Thomeer RT, Vanneste JA: The value of temporary external lumbar CSF drainage in predicting the outcome of shunting on normal pressure hydrocephalus. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2002,72(4):503–506.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Hamilton R, Patel S, Lee EB, Jackson EM, Lopinto J, Arnold SE, Clark CM, Basil A, Shaw LM, Xie SX, Grady MS, Trojanowski JQ: Lack of shunt response in suspected idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus with Alzheimer disease pathology. Ann Neurol 2010,68(4):535–540. 10.1002/ana.22015View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Leinonen V, Koivisto AM, Savolainen S, Rummukainen J, Sutela A, Vanninen R, Jääskeläinen JE, Soininen H, Alafuzoff I: Post-mortem findings in 10 patients with presumed normal-pressure hydrocephalus and review of the literature. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 2012,38(1):72–86. 10.1111/j.1365-2990.2011.01195.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cabral D, Beach TG, Vedders L, Sue LI, Jacobson S, Myers K, Sabbagh MN: Frequency of Alzheimer's disease pathology at autopsy in patients with clinical normal pressure hydrocephalus. Alzheimers Dement 2011,7(5):509–513. 10.1016/j.jalz.2010.12.008View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Morariu MA: Progressive supranuclear palsy and normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Neurology 1979,29(11):1544–1546. 10.1212/WNL.29.11.1544View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Alisky J: Normal pressure hydrocephalus co-existing with a second dementia disorder. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 2008,4(1):301–304.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Chakravarty A: Unifying concept for Alzheimer's disease, vascular dementia and normal pressure hydrocephalus - a hypothesis. Med Hypotheses 2004,63(5):827–833. 10.1016/j.mehy.2004.03.029View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Silverberg GD, Mayo M, Saul T, Rubenstein E, McGuire D: Alzheimer's disease, normal-pressure hydrocephalus, and senescent changes in CSF circulatory physiology: a hypothesis. Lancet Neurol 2003,2(8):506–511. 10.1016/S1474-4422(03)00487-3View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Silverberg GD, Mayo M, Saul T, Fellmann J, Carvalho J, McGuire D: Continuous CSF drainage in AD: results of a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. Neurology 2008,71(3):202–209. 10.1212/01.wnl.0000316197.04157.6fView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Magdalinou NK, Ling H, Smith JD, Schott JM, Watkins LD, Lees AJ: Normal pressure hydrocephalus or progressive supranuclear palsy? A clinicopathological case series. J Neurol 2013,260(4):1009–1013. 10.1007/s00415-012-6745-6View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Curran T, Lang AE: Parkinsonian syndromes associated with hydrocephalus: case reports, a review of the literature, and pathophysiological hypotheses. Mov Disord 1994,9(5):508–520. 10.1002/mds.870090503View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Burghaus L, Eggers C, Timmermann L, Fink GR, Diederich NJ: Hallucinations in neurodegenerative diseases. CNS Neurosci Ther 2012,18(2):149–159. 10.1111/j.1755-5949.2011.00247.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.