Table 1 AFT captures greater arrhythmokinesis than SFT in PDs but not controls
From: Arrhythmokinesis is evident during unimanual not bimanual finger tapping in Parkinson’s disease
Unimanual AFT | Bimanual SFT | P Value | |
|---|---|---|---|
CV Amp (25-75% range) or (SD) | CV Amp (25-75% range) or (SD) | ||
PD MA | 38.6 (16.9) | 14.5 (14.3) | P < 0.001 |
PD LA | 25.5 (10.7) | 8.55 (9.20) | P < 0.001 |
Control DH | 7.21 (6.76) | 2.31 (3.75) | NS |
Control NDH | 10.5 (8.94) | 2.94 (3.82) | NS |
CV ISI (25-75% range) or (SD) | CV ISI (25-75% range) or (SD) | ||
PD MA | 37.0 (12.5) | 18.6 (11.4) | P < 0.001 |
PD LA | 26.1 (15.9-30.3) | 12.6 (9.15-18.5) | P < 0.05 |
Control DH | 13.8 (5.4) | 9.79 (4.21) | NS |
Control NDH | 14.28 (10.04-17.98) | 10.45 (7.61-16.21) | NS |